<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is electromagnetic radiation from computers a valid health hazard?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://personalhealthmonitors.com/is-electromagnetic-radiation-from-computers-a-valid-health-hazard/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://personalhealthmonitors.com/is-electromagnetic-radiation-from-computers-a-valid-health-hazard/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:39:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Personal Health Monitors</title>
		<link>http://personalhealthmonitors.com/is-electromagnetic-radiation-from-computers-a-valid-health-hazard/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Personal Health Monitors</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 08:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://personalhealthmonitors.com/is-electromagnetic-radiation-from-computers-a-valid-health-hazard/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://smartrfids.com&quot;&gt;Smart RFIDs&lt;/a&gt;


The best bet, to cut through all the special interest groups that spout propaganda around &quot;radiation&quot; issues, is ( I think ) to ask &quot; Is there any evidence of widespread problems with the use of these bits of equipment?&quot;
Production of computers ( and TV&#039;s - they radiate from their screens just as much as computers ) runs now into the 1000&#039;s of millions.... a vast number, with some remarkable exposure times racked up by a lot of people. And, despite endless looking, the epidemiologists cannot find any link to suggest em radiation from household appliances is any kind of a risk ( except tanning lamps ).
Sure, my brother-in-law&#039;s daughter developed cataracts after playing computer games  for 4 months solid........ quite sad but the other million folk who played for longer and didn&#039;t have their eyes go funny. Were her eyes not going to cloud over anyway, and nothing to do with the computer??  We can&#039;t know but we do know that if there were a lot of them, we would find out. 
Then there is the mechanism...... how would something as feeble as the em radiation from appliances, cause any health problems? The energy isn&#039;t enough to  cause  chemical  changes, or the correct frequency to induce vibrational heating. And historically people have been subjected to massive does of all sorts of radiation ( all those early TVs and those big brick cell phones ) and there was no epidemic.
I&#039;m closing in on being dead, after a long life of exposure to all sorts of stuff ( including a childhood in one of the world&#039;s most polluted environments.) and I seem to have had no ill effects. That is an anecdote - it isn&#039;t worth the phosphor dots its glowing on. I&#039;m convinced there is  ( and  never has been )  no danger from low frequency EM radiation.  You have to gather your own evidence and decide for yourself. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://smartrfids.com">Smart RFIDs</a></p>
<p>The best bet, to cut through all the special interest groups that spout propaganda around &#8220;radiation&#8221; issues, is ( I think ) to ask &#8221; Is there any evidence of widespread problems with the use of these bits of equipment?&#8221;<br />
Production of computers ( and TV&#8217;s &#8211; they radiate from their screens just as much as computers ) runs now into the 1000&#8217;s of millions&#8230;. a vast number, with some remarkable exposure times racked up by a lot of people. And, despite endless looking, the epidemiologists cannot find any link to suggest em radiation from household appliances is any kind of a risk ( except tanning lamps ).<br />
Sure, my brother-in-law&#8217;s daughter developed cataracts after playing computer games  for 4 months solid&#8230;&#8230;.. quite sad but the other million folk who played for longer and didn&#8217;t have their eyes go funny. Were her eyes not going to cloud over anyway, and nothing to do with the computer??  We can&#8217;t know but we do know that if there were a lot of them, we would find out.<br />
Then there is the mechanism&#8230;&#8230; how would something as feeble as the em radiation from appliances, cause any health problems? The energy isn&#8217;t enough to  cause  chemical  changes, or the correct frequency to induce vibrational heating. And historically people have been subjected to massive does of all sorts of radiation ( all those early TVs and those big brick cell phones ) and there was no epidemic.<br />
I&#8217;m closing in on being dead, after a long life of exposure to all sorts of stuff ( including a childhood in one of the world&#8217;s most polluted environments.) and I seem to have had no ill effects. That is an anecdote &#8211; it isn&#8217;t worth the phosphor dots its glowing on. I&#8217;m convinced there is  ( and  never has been )  no danger from low frequency EM radiation.  You have to gather your own evidence and decide for yourself. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
